guglmaya.blogg.se - Aquai drupal

#Aquai drupal software
#Aquai drupal license

Pre-packaged solutions (modules and bundles of modules), access to Acquia Cloud hosting, maintenance, and support - all in addition to outside implementation and consulting costs - contribute to a far more expensive price tag than many organizations anticipated at the outset.

#Aquai drupal software

Particularly in enterprise environments, implementation represents the highest cost associated with getting any software package up and running.Īcquia Lightning compounds these costs because it has abandoned many of the open source principles of the Drupal platform.

#Aquai drupal license

While there isn’t a license fee to use Drupal or Acquia’s Drupal distribution, Lightning, that hardly means that either is low cost – much less free. Takeaway: Acquia’s business model erases many of the benefits of open source software. While Acquia is built on Drupal’s open source platform, the truth is that many of the benefits of open source disappear with Acquia’s hybrid model: open proprietary. Lower implementation and maintenance cost And what about for Acquia? Here’s the reality compared to proprietary software:Ģ. These are perceived benefits of open source software – and they don’t often hold up under scrutiny. On the other hand, as a “Future of Open Source” survey reveals, organizations tend to choose open source software for four top reasons: Cost, Security, Vendor “lock-in,” and Quality. If you value or require software that is governed by clear development principles and best practices - providing consistency, clarity, and predictability for development, implementation, and deployment - then chances are that you predominantly use proprietary software systems like Sitecore. Pitting proprietary software against open source systems is a decades-old pastime and, by now, most organizations have determined which model they’re comfortable with for different parts of their technology stack.

Are your needs confined to a WCM product or do you really need a Digital Experience Platform (DXP)? WCM systems offer more capability than ever, but a WCM is not a DXP and Acquia is missing some critical capabilities.

Do you prefer open source or proprietary software? This is essentially philosophical, but, even if you’re gravitating toward open source, Acquia’s “open proprietary” nature may mean it still isn’t the best option for you.

There are, however, two critical differences: From templating and workflow for content creation to revisioning, publishing, editing, and delivering web content, Sitecore and Acquia both offer highly flexible web content management systems that will meet the vast majority of businesses’ needs. Let’s face it: Web Content Management (WCM) is a mature technology and the amount of functional differentiation between vendors now exists in the margins. And its platform lacks critical functionality compared with Sitecore ’s. Key takeaway: Acquia’s business model erases many of the benefits of open source - including most of the cost savings. And on closer examination, Acquia's platform doesn't fulfill the promise of open source. Sitecore's connected platform manages the end-to-end content lifecycle, providing critical capabilities that Acquia simply can't.